MADD Increases Breathalyzer Usage
The group everyone is well informed of, Mothers against Drunk Driving (MADD), is attempting to go above and beyond like never before. State highways operators are already responsible for the drinking age to begin at 21 years old and the limit to be 0.8%. Now, MADD is taking this one step further. Already you can get a DUI and install a breathalyzer in your car in order to stay out of jail. A breathalyzer, according to alcoholalert.com, is an ignition interlock device that prevents a previous offender of drunk driving from starting their car until they have breathed into the device. This device tells reads the offenders blood alcohol content and will not start if they breathe over a 0.8%. Mothers Against Drunk Driving are now trying to implement a strong law that mandates these interlocked devices are installed in every car throughout the United States. Already these devices have reduced drunken accidents in New Mexico by 35%.
I think this is a great idea but needs some tweaking. Obviously drunk drivers account for a majority of the accidents on highways across the nation every year and are also responsible for numerous fatalities. While installing a breathalyzer in every car is a good idea I do not think it is practical. What if someone were to go out to dinner and a ball game and perhaps had a beer or two – would their car still start or would it assume they are drunk or incapable of driving? Also, this idea sort of falls in contradiction of our rights and freedoms, does it not? It is hard for me to understand where MADD gained the rights or knowledge to assume everybody drives drunk all the time. I understand their motive and good-will, I just don’t find it too practical. I do believe it would dramatically decrease accidents and other alcohol related dilemmas every year but it needs a little more thought and test trials before being mandated otherwise serious ethical issues and controversies may arise from the public. Society would greatly benefit from its overall affect though.
Reference Used:
http://www.time.com/time/business/article/0,8599,1907493,00.html?cnn=yes
Additional References:
http://www.alcoholalert.com/car-breathalyzer.html
http://www.usatoday.com/money/autos/2006-04-24-breathalyzer-usat_x.htm
Wednesday, July 1, 2009
Journal 14, July 1
Fatal Technology Dependence
As our dependence on technology increases, it seems we become more prone to it acting against us. Early last week two trains collided in the D.C.-Maryland area killing nine people. The rails are automatically operated by a system that dates back to the late 1970s meaning it is over 30-years old. Around 5 o’clock in the evening, two trains seemed to have bypassed the system and ran into each other. The systems emergency program should have realized that the conditions on the track were not suitable for both trains to be traveling the directions they were. For whatever reason, which is still be investigated, the message relayed by the sensors on the track never made it to the control room. Officials state, however, that these computerized control rooms that operate automatically, for the most part, are actually safer than humans operating them and human error occurring more frequently. Most large cities and metropolitan areas operate their rail systems on similar programs and have yet to have such a catastrophe. These cities include Boston, San Francisco, Miami, and hopefully soon-to-be Charlotte. The systems are actually extremely safe and receive updates and maintenance regularly.
Riding the train not only saves you money but is more efficient and safer, in majority. People in society are actually more at risk when driving than a being involved in a train wreck. The only stipulation with riding the train is that, more often than not, when a crash does occur multiple people are usually hurt if not killed. One of these particular trains was notified of safety concerns in 2006, states MSNBC, but failed to follow through with compliance. If society is going to give up driving themselves and ride public transit, they need to have to utmost trust in the city with their safety. Studies show that a majority of the people who drive believe they are better than average drivers when in fact only a small percentage are even somewhat descent at the task. Therefore, like I previous stated, in order for people to put their lives in the hands of public transit they need to be one-hundred percent positive the city has taken every precautionary measure to ensure their safety and well-being; I am doubtful that a train is any safer than a car when it comes to wrecks. However, we must remember we can not hide from accidents all our lives and riding the train is better on our wallets and the environment.
Reference Used:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/06/25/automatic.system.washington.crash/index.html
Additional Reference:
http://articles.directorym.com/Train_Accidents_Maryland-r995-Maryland.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31495088/ns/us_news-life/
As our dependence on technology increases, it seems we become more prone to it acting against us. Early last week two trains collided in the D.C.-Maryland area killing nine people. The rails are automatically operated by a system that dates back to the late 1970s meaning it is over 30-years old. Around 5 o’clock in the evening, two trains seemed to have bypassed the system and ran into each other. The systems emergency program should have realized that the conditions on the track were not suitable for both trains to be traveling the directions they were. For whatever reason, which is still be investigated, the message relayed by the sensors on the track never made it to the control room. Officials state, however, that these computerized control rooms that operate automatically, for the most part, are actually safer than humans operating them and human error occurring more frequently. Most large cities and metropolitan areas operate their rail systems on similar programs and have yet to have such a catastrophe. These cities include Boston, San Francisco, Miami, and hopefully soon-to-be Charlotte. The systems are actually extremely safe and receive updates and maintenance regularly.
Riding the train not only saves you money but is more efficient and safer, in majority. People in society are actually more at risk when driving than a being involved in a train wreck. The only stipulation with riding the train is that, more often than not, when a crash does occur multiple people are usually hurt if not killed. One of these particular trains was notified of safety concerns in 2006, states MSNBC, but failed to follow through with compliance. If society is going to give up driving themselves and ride public transit, they need to have to utmost trust in the city with their safety. Studies show that a majority of the people who drive believe they are better than average drivers when in fact only a small percentage are even somewhat descent at the task. Therefore, like I previous stated, in order for people to put their lives in the hands of public transit they need to be one-hundred percent positive the city has taken every precautionary measure to ensure their safety and well-being; I am doubtful that a train is any safer than a car when it comes to wrecks. However, we must remember we can not hide from accidents all our lives and riding the train is better on our wallets and the environment.
Reference Used:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/06/25/automatic.system.washington.crash/index.html
Additional Reference:
http://articles.directorym.com/Train_Accidents_Maryland-r995-Maryland.html
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31495088/ns/us_news-life/
Journal 13, July 1
Full-Body Gaming System: Microsoft
In ten years or so one could potentially use the principal behind a full-body gaming system to train for their job. Recently talked about on Newscientist.com is Microsoft, the company that brought you the PC and Xbox among other things, has begun the creation of a full-body gaming device. This system is like no other of its kind. With the code name Natal, this new system will be the most realistic in comparison to movements and emotions. Natal is based off of an inferred camera system made in the Middle East except this particular system only uses two cameras. One camera will focus on the depth between the individual and the object they are focusing and be within two centimeters without error. The second camera will be geared more towards catching the aspects around the individual such as color and texture. The only stipulation they have encountered so far is that the cameras will not pick up what is surrounding or behind the player. Also equipped with Natal is an emotion detector, if you will. The website Wired states that Natal will be able to sign players in by recognizing their facial characteristics as well as use their emotions while playing the game to increase reality. Emotions will also be analyzed through voice recognition. Although they have not come up with a way to work through the voice recognizer being successful in a room of a few people talking at once, some solutions are in talks. One possibility is to use lip-reading software while others suggest software that can recognize up the three voices at once when talking at the same time.
With gaming systems being created ever so quickly and becoming more realistic in the sense of graphics as well as replicating the user, training for high profile jobs such as military, swat team, or even pilots could use systems like this that would fully prepare them, in most cases, for what their job is really like. I find it extremely hard to believe that by the time this project is complete, the younger kids of today’s world will compare this to Atari when I was a kid. That is how much progress has been made in the gaming world since I was a child or just technology in general. With Microsoft creating a device that involved such involved I think this will widely open the doors for many new useful innovations.
Reference Used:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17258-innovation-behind-microsofts-fullbody-gaming-interface.html?page=2
Additional Reference:
http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/06/e3-microsoft-live-blog/
In ten years or so one could potentially use the principal behind a full-body gaming system to train for their job. Recently talked about on Newscientist.com is Microsoft, the company that brought you the PC and Xbox among other things, has begun the creation of a full-body gaming device. This system is like no other of its kind. With the code name Natal, this new system will be the most realistic in comparison to movements and emotions. Natal is based off of an inferred camera system made in the Middle East except this particular system only uses two cameras. One camera will focus on the depth between the individual and the object they are focusing and be within two centimeters without error. The second camera will be geared more towards catching the aspects around the individual such as color and texture. The only stipulation they have encountered so far is that the cameras will not pick up what is surrounding or behind the player. Also equipped with Natal is an emotion detector, if you will. The website Wired states that Natal will be able to sign players in by recognizing their facial characteristics as well as use their emotions while playing the game to increase reality. Emotions will also be analyzed through voice recognition. Although they have not come up with a way to work through the voice recognizer being successful in a room of a few people talking at once, some solutions are in talks. One possibility is to use lip-reading software while others suggest software that can recognize up the three voices at once when talking at the same time.
With gaming systems being created ever so quickly and becoming more realistic in the sense of graphics as well as replicating the user, training for high profile jobs such as military, swat team, or even pilots could use systems like this that would fully prepare them, in most cases, for what their job is really like. I find it extremely hard to believe that by the time this project is complete, the younger kids of today’s world will compare this to Atari when I was a kid. That is how much progress has been made in the gaming world since I was a child or just technology in general. With Microsoft creating a device that involved such involved I think this will widely open the doors for many new useful innovations.
Reference Used:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17258-innovation-behind-microsofts-fullbody-gaming-interface.html?page=2
Additional Reference:
http://www.wired.com/gamelife/2009/06/e3-microsoft-live-blog/
Sunday, June 21, 2009
Journal 12, June 21
Space Tourism
In the early years of the nineteen-hundreds, leading up to the first flight, the thought of an airplane wasn’t a concern for many. But with passion and dedication, the Wright brothers took their stance in history creating the first powered aircraft flight. Today we arrive at a similar but quite more complex situation. Richard Branson, the business mogul behind Virgin Mobile, has officially begun the initial construction of Spaceport America which will facilitate the launch of aircraft of tourist to outer space. The facility, located in New Mexico, will launch aircrafts 50,000 thousand feet above earth with up to six tourists. From there, the aircraft will release a spaceship, which will be powered by rockets to move throughout space. These trips will cost passengers, on average, around $200,000.
By 2020, the developers predict to have spaceports in California, New Mexico, Florida, Virginia, and Wisconsin with in the United States and in other countries as well such as Singapore and Dubai. Around this time passengers will also be able to hopefully take a two week trip to the moon with a private astronaut, or pilot.
The idea of flying into space for the day with business partners or clients is incredible. When we were all growing up the idea of space travel was merely science fiction or fantasy. It is finally becoming reality. Society will most definitely benefit from this new form of travel in that they will “not only have a feeling of separation but a feeling of connection,” says a source with CNN. The feeling one would have when actually peering down onto the earth and able to see 1,000 miles in any direction is unimaginable. The fact alone that we have the technology and sophistication about space to have the confidence to take the average Joe with a few bucks on a trip, literally, “out of this world” is impressive. This is a huge step towards discovering more about space and the limits society can achieve current generations and many to come.
Reference Used:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/06/20/new.mexico.spaceport/index.html#cnnSTCText
Additional References:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/04/30/space.tour/index.html#cnnSTCText
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/10/20/future.airports/index.html#cnnSTCText
http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/31/news/companies/siklos_virgin_america.fortune/index.htm
In the early years of the nineteen-hundreds, leading up to the first flight, the thought of an airplane wasn’t a concern for many. But with passion and dedication, the Wright brothers took their stance in history creating the first powered aircraft flight. Today we arrive at a similar but quite more complex situation. Richard Branson, the business mogul behind Virgin Mobile, has officially begun the initial construction of Spaceport America which will facilitate the launch of aircraft of tourist to outer space. The facility, located in New Mexico, will launch aircrafts 50,000 thousand feet above earth with up to six tourists. From there, the aircraft will release a spaceship, which will be powered by rockets to move throughout space. These trips will cost passengers, on average, around $200,000.
By 2020, the developers predict to have spaceports in California, New Mexico, Florida, Virginia, and Wisconsin with in the United States and in other countries as well such as Singapore and Dubai. Around this time passengers will also be able to hopefully take a two week trip to the moon with a private astronaut, or pilot.
The idea of flying into space for the day with business partners or clients is incredible. When we were all growing up the idea of space travel was merely science fiction or fantasy. It is finally becoming reality. Society will most definitely benefit from this new form of travel in that they will “not only have a feeling of separation but a feeling of connection,” says a source with CNN. The feeling one would have when actually peering down onto the earth and able to see 1,000 miles in any direction is unimaginable. The fact alone that we have the technology and sophistication about space to have the confidence to take the average Joe with a few bucks on a trip, literally, “out of this world” is impressive. This is a huge step towards discovering more about space and the limits society can achieve current generations and many to come.
Reference Used:
http://www.cnn.com/2009/TECH/space/06/20/new.mexico.spaceport/index.html#cnnSTCText
Additional References:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/04/30/space.tour/index.html#cnnSTCText
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/science/10/20/future.airports/index.html#cnnSTCText
http://money.cnn.com/2008/07/31/news/companies/siklos_virgin_america.fortune/index.htm
Journal 11, June 21
The Ocean Working For Us
NASA, among many other developers, is building prototypes that could eventually save society thousand of dollars a year. Continuous research has shown that turbines placed deep in the ocean darkness or in other heavy flowing water supplies could potentially produce enough electricity to power a couple thousand homes each. The idea is essentially the same as that of a wind farm out in the middle of now where except this time the wind mills are under water, making them hydrokinetic energy producing water turbines. The way these turbines operate is by being placed in an area that catches the roughest ocean currents, tides, and waves and uses that force to transmit electricity through underwater cables to the land. This idea is highly correlated to that of hydroelectric plants which use the pressure of the water once it is released from the dam to turn the turbines. The only difference here is that hydroelectric plants are limited in the amount of water they can release each time to turn the turbines therefore resulting in limited energy. The advantage underwater turbines have over the traditional hydroelectric plant is that the energy supply is not only predictable depending on seasons but the currents and tides constantly flow. Meaning the energy being produced could be a non-stop process. NASA currently has many test sites that are constantly collecting data; one being in the Manhattan River. Other researchers are testing the idea near Scotland and Britain where the power and speed of the tides is among the highest.
Using Mother Nature in a beneficial way such as this almost seems strange. Most of the time it is us attempting to go against Mother Nature whether we are building the tallest skyscraper or taking a cruise across the ocean against a vigorous storm. But this time, we are using the driving force of the ocean to benefit society in an attempt that meets all green standards. I think putting the ocean to work to help generate electricity for thousands of homes per machine is an excellent idea. Not only will society as a whole, including individuals' homes but corporations as well, save money but the pollution and health hazards stemming from nuclear-power plants will be greatly minimized. The only concern would be similar to that of the wind mill farms when it comes to migrational patterns. There would have to be safeguard measures put in play to prevent species from getting sucked into these massive turbines (just something to think about). Despite that concern that can easily be maneuvered around, I see no harm in this project, only divine results.
Reference Used:
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/tideenergy.html
Additional References:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3694859.ece
NASA, among many other developers, is building prototypes that could eventually save society thousand of dollars a year. Continuous research has shown that turbines placed deep in the ocean darkness or in other heavy flowing water supplies could potentially produce enough electricity to power a couple thousand homes each. The idea is essentially the same as that of a wind farm out in the middle of now where except this time the wind mills are under water, making them hydrokinetic energy producing water turbines. The way these turbines operate is by being placed in an area that catches the roughest ocean currents, tides, and waves and uses that force to transmit electricity through underwater cables to the land. This idea is highly correlated to that of hydroelectric plants which use the pressure of the water once it is released from the dam to turn the turbines. The only difference here is that hydroelectric plants are limited in the amount of water they can release each time to turn the turbines therefore resulting in limited energy. The advantage underwater turbines have over the traditional hydroelectric plant is that the energy supply is not only predictable depending on seasons but the currents and tides constantly flow. Meaning the energy being produced could be a non-stop process. NASA currently has many test sites that are constantly collecting data; one being in the Manhattan River. Other researchers are testing the idea near Scotland and Britain where the power and speed of the tides is among the highest.
Using Mother Nature in a beneficial way such as this almost seems strange. Most of the time it is us attempting to go against Mother Nature whether we are building the tallest skyscraper or taking a cruise across the ocean against a vigorous storm. But this time, we are using the driving force of the ocean to benefit society in an attempt that meets all green standards. I think putting the ocean to work to help generate electricity for thousands of homes per machine is an excellent idea. Not only will society as a whole, including individuals' homes but corporations as well, save money but the pollution and health hazards stemming from nuclear-power plants will be greatly minimized. The only concern would be similar to that of the wind mill farms when it comes to migrational patterns. There would have to be safeguard measures put in play to prevent species from getting sucked into these massive turbines (just something to think about). Despite that concern that can easily be maneuvered around, I see no harm in this project, only divine results.
Reference Used:
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/tideenergy.html
Additional References:
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article3694859.ece
Journal 10, June 21
Musically "Alarming" Diapers
New research indicates there could possibly be a solution to a common problem occurring in the early stages of a developing family. It doesn't matter who your parents or who you know. Every child has to be toilet trained and some simply take longer than others to learn. Although I have yet to be a parent, hoping that will continue to stay true for many years, many parents out there wish there was a device to make their lives easier when it comes to "potty-training" their children. Well, may their wishes be granted.
To efficiently create a solution to this problem, researchers have developed a musical diaper. This "incredible" diaper is designed to notify the child's care-giver whenever their diaper has been soiled. The only stipulation is the adult must be within the vicinity of the child in order to hear the alarm, or music (this shouldn’t be a problem anyways). The diaper has sensors integrated into the bottom portion of the diaper itself that sends a signal notifying the alarm to sound due to wetness. Parents can then take the necessary action to resolve the issue. Random populations of thirty-nine children between the ages of 18-30 months were selected for the study. At the end of a ten day testing period, the results showed that almost 52% of the time the children had more control over their bladder and did better than 8.3% who were given a placebo.
What will they come up with next? The creation of a musical diaper seems extraordinary. This device will relieve parents of that much more pressure and assist them in using their time as efficient as possible. After all, taking care of young children is time consuming and stressful enough as it is. The musical diaper will allow the parents or caregivers to continue with their daily tasks without having to stop every couple minutes to check the child's diaper to see if they have soiled yet another one. Although I think this is a great invention the only question I would raise is in regards to the side affects. It seems that these convenient diapers would be powered by batteries and may not only be un-comfortable sitting on a battery pack, but what happens if the battery leaks. The articles did not state how the battery or power device was stored or any safety precautions involved but I would hope there would be some preventative to ensure the child receives no burns in the event the battery has a tiny leak. Another concern may be the power portion of the device that was not intended to get wet actually got wet. Would the child get electrocuted? Like I previously said, a musical diaper sounds like a helpful and efficient invention as long as the previously stated concerns are dealt with and prevented in the highest regard.
Reference Used:
http://www.lockergnome.com/news/2009/06/12/study-evaluates-use-of-diaper-alarm-for-toilet-training-children/
Additional Reference:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/152610.php
New research indicates there could possibly be a solution to a common problem occurring in the early stages of a developing family. It doesn't matter who your parents or who you know. Every child has to be toilet trained and some simply take longer than others to learn. Although I have yet to be a parent, hoping that will continue to stay true for many years, many parents out there wish there was a device to make their lives easier when it comes to "potty-training" their children. Well, may their wishes be granted.
To efficiently create a solution to this problem, researchers have developed a musical diaper. This "incredible" diaper is designed to notify the child's care-giver whenever their diaper has been soiled. The only stipulation is the adult must be within the vicinity of the child in order to hear the alarm, or music (this shouldn’t be a problem anyways). The diaper has sensors integrated into the bottom portion of the diaper itself that sends a signal notifying the alarm to sound due to wetness. Parents can then take the necessary action to resolve the issue. Random populations of thirty-nine children between the ages of 18-30 months were selected for the study. At the end of a ten day testing period, the results showed that almost 52% of the time the children had more control over their bladder and did better than 8.3% who were given a placebo.
What will they come up with next? The creation of a musical diaper seems extraordinary. This device will relieve parents of that much more pressure and assist them in using their time as efficient as possible. After all, taking care of young children is time consuming and stressful enough as it is. The musical diaper will allow the parents or caregivers to continue with their daily tasks without having to stop every couple minutes to check the child's diaper to see if they have soiled yet another one. Although I think this is a great invention the only question I would raise is in regards to the side affects. It seems that these convenient diapers would be powered by batteries and may not only be un-comfortable sitting on a battery pack, but what happens if the battery leaks. The articles did not state how the battery or power device was stored or any safety precautions involved but I would hope there would be some preventative to ensure the child receives no burns in the event the battery has a tiny leak. Another concern may be the power portion of the device that was not intended to get wet actually got wet. Would the child get electrocuted? Like I previously said, a musical diaper sounds like a helpful and efficient invention as long as the previously stated concerns are dealt with and prevented in the highest regard.
Reference Used:
http://www.lockergnome.com/news/2009/06/12/study-evaluates-use-of-diaper-alarm-for-toilet-training-children/
Additional Reference:
http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/152610.php
Sunday, June 14, 2009
Journal 9, June 14
A World of Robots
As technology rapidly advances, the use of robots and their interaction with society also progresses. Robots were originally created to assist mostly in large manufacturing plants to help lift large heavy materials or hot metal in the early 1960s. Today, robots do nearly everything humans do and even some participate in activities humans normally would not. The army and police units use robots to detect bombs and mine fields while a normal household may have a robotic device that cleans the kitchen floor or mows the front lawn.
The capabilities of robots get larger all the time. Robots have already been created that assist manufactures in building tiny microprocessors, mass produce vehicles, and even help doctors perform a surgical procedure half way across the world. Doctors can now hook sensors to various parts of their arms and head to operate a robotic arm located miles away from them. The robot senses the doctors’ movements and replicates them accordingly on the patient. To help cut down on manufacturing costs robots have replaced plant workers to create lower product costs and work more efficiently. The only question that arises as robots become more sophisticated is in regards to their cognitive progress. Currently the law supports humans in ways they can put a patent on their ideas and inventions. But what happens if and when a robot eventually has its own thought or idea? The law only supports human inventions. The question comes into play of whether the robot inventor should obtain the patent or something be arranged with respect to the robot it self.
Robots should definitely be closely watched and analyzed before they start to process their own ideas and inventions. Otherwise it could lead to destructive actions or the turn on humans, which would be the ultimate dilemma. As far as rights and patents are concerned, I do not think society is ready for that discussion or decision process. First, society needs to see and trust robots to be sure they want them interacting in everyday tasks. Next, we need to actually create robots that can think and act on their own. With that said, I think it will surely be a few years, not long though, before this question needs to be answered.
Reference Used:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/future-tech/66915.html
Additional References:
http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=74
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots
As technology rapidly advances, the use of robots and their interaction with society also progresses. Robots were originally created to assist mostly in large manufacturing plants to help lift large heavy materials or hot metal in the early 1960s. Today, robots do nearly everything humans do and even some participate in activities humans normally would not. The army and police units use robots to detect bombs and mine fields while a normal household may have a robotic device that cleans the kitchen floor or mows the front lawn.
The capabilities of robots get larger all the time. Robots have already been created that assist manufactures in building tiny microprocessors, mass produce vehicles, and even help doctors perform a surgical procedure half way across the world. Doctors can now hook sensors to various parts of their arms and head to operate a robotic arm located miles away from them. The robot senses the doctors’ movements and replicates them accordingly on the patient. To help cut down on manufacturing costs robots have replaced plant workers to create lower product costs and work more efficiently. The only question that arises as robots become more sophisticated is in regards to their cognitive progress. Currently the law supports humans in ways they can put a patent on their ideas and inventions. But what happens if and when a robot eventually has its own thought or idea? The law only supports human inventions. The question comes into play of whether the robot inventor should obtain the patent or something be arranged with respect to the robot it self.
Robots should definitely be closely watched and analyzed before they start to process their own ideas and inventions. Otherwise it could lead to destructive actions or the turn on humans, which would be the ultimate dilemma. As far as rights and patents are concerned, I do not think society is ready for that discussion or decision process. First, society needs to see and trust robots to be sure they want them interacting in everyday tasks. Next, we need to actually create robots that can think and act on their own. With that said, I think it will surely be a few years, not long though, before this question needs to be answered.
Reference Used:
http://www.technewsworld.com/story/future-tech/66915.html
Additional References:
http://www.irobot.com/sp.cfm?pageid=74
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robots
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)